diff options
| author | Garrett D'Amore <garrett@damore.org> | 2020-03-15 02:40:16 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Garrett D'Amore <garrett@damore.org> | 2020-03-15 02:40:16 -0700 |
| commit | 8754a426046040cd62e3bc073c7d1eb0adc318a1 (patch) | |
| tree | 64a5180c075de0ac3368254c4089ff78c6544295 /RATIONALE.html | |
| parent | c392a678b78e38092c012c265eea273dfc6f722f (diff) | |
| download | nng-8754a426046040cd62e3bc073c7d1eb0adc318a1.tar.gz nng-8754a426046040cd62e3bc073c7d1eb0adc318a1.tar.bz2 nng-8754a426046040cd62e3bc073c7d1eb0adc318a1.zip | |
Revert "fix layouts"
This reverts commit c392a678b78e38092c012c265eea273dfc6f722f.
Diffstat (limited to 'RATIONALE.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | RATIONALE.html | 38 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/RATIONALE.html b/RATIONALE.html index 44b9054e..fef8ee44 100644 --- a/RATIONALE.html +++ b/RATIONALE.html @@ -1,20 +1,9 @@ --- -layout: +layout: nng +title: Rationale: Or why am I bothering to rewrite nanomsg? --- -<!DOCTYPE html> -<html lang="en"> -<head> -<meta charset="UTF-8"> -<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge"> -<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"> -<meta name="generator" content="Asciidoctor 2.0.10"> -<meta name="author" content="Garrett D’Amore"> -<title>Rationale: Or why am I bothering to rewrite nanomsg?</title> -<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans:300,300italic,400,400italic,600,600italic%7CNoto+Serif:400,400italic,700,700italic%7CDroid+Sans+Mono:400,700"> -<link rel="stylesheet" href="./asciidoctor.css"> -<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/font-awesome/4.7.0/css/font-awesome.min.css"> -</head> -<body class="article"> + +<main> <div id="header"> <h1>Rationale: Or why am I bothering to rewrite nanomsg?</h1> <div class="details"> @@ -35,8 +24,8 @@ layout: </td> <td class="content"> You might want to review - <a href="http://nanomsg.org/documentation-zeromq.html">Martin Sustrik’s rationale</a> - for nanomsg vs. ZeroMQ. +<a href="http://nanomsg.org/documentation-zeromq.html">Martin Sustrik’s rationale</a> +for nanomsg vs. ZeroMQ. </td> </tr> </table> @@ -203,9 +192,9 @@ calls, beyond the 2 required to actually send and receive the message.</p> </td> <td class="content"> Its even more hideous to support this on Windows, where there is no - <code>pipe(2)</code> system call, so we have to cobble up a loopback TCP connection - just for this event notification, in addition to the system call - explosion. +<code>pipe(2)</code> system call, so we have to cobble up a loopback TCP connection +just for this event notification, in addition to the system call +explosion. </td> </tr> </table> @@ -613,11 +602,4 @@ simpler, and more efficient implementation.</p> </div> </div> </div> -<div id="footer"> -<div id="footer-text"> -Version 0.4<br> -Last updated 2020-01-29 02:55:19 UTC -</div> -</div> -</body> -</html>
\ No newline at end of file +</main> |